Hi all,
At our last meeting, the DC study group reviewed the 100% Club's practice questions for Domain 4 (administration). We want to get your advice on a few questions.
First question...
2. Which of the following is true regarding the personal liability of officers and directors?
a. Incompetence and bad judgment are reasonable tests for liability.
b. Unintentional injury or damage to persons or property can give rise to personal liability.
c. Officers are personally liable for the performance of contracts entered into by the association.
d. Directors and Officers Liability Insurance protects the association from claims of liability if it is required to pay claims or defend officers and directors it has indemnified.
B is listed as the correct answer. We thought this answer was wrong, and possibly because of a typo. Aren't board members only liable for "intentional" and not "unintentional" injury or damage (i.e. the answer should be (?) "Intentional injury or damage to persons or property can give rise to personal liability"). From our readings, we understood that officers and directors are personally liable if negligence or intent is present. And, now seeing the answers to Question 10 in this thread about D&O insurance not covering negligence on the part of the board, I think that we may be correct in thinking the answer should be "intentional" rather than "unintentional." What do you all say?
Next question...
6. Which of the following could be asked in a job interview without incurring liability?
a. What is your birthplace?
b. I noticed a slight accent, where are you from?
c. Are you a citizen of the US?
d. Are you authorized to work in the US on a full time basis?
D. is the answer. We have no dispute about this answer but, rather, question about a related scenario. If an interviewee offers information about any of the forbidden topics (ethnicity, parental status, country of origin), it is ever appropriate for the employer to ask a follow up question or engage in conversation about the topic raised. It seemed to us the answer is probably no and that its best to not discuss it in anyway and move on to a safe topic. Also, is all conversation with an interviewee considered part of the interview (e.g. including chit/chat before or after the official interview session).
Next question...
12. You are the CEO of an association with a staff of 5. Your office officially closed because of a blizzard. However, because of an imminent Board meeting, you have asked your administrative assistant to finish some work at the office. She expresses concern about the hazardous driving conditions, but on your insistence, she relents. During her drive to the office, she has a serious car accident requiring lengthy hospitalization. Which of the following BEST describes the Board's legal liability for this situation?
a. None, the employee is responsible for own commuting.
b. The same as any weekend work when the office is officially closed.
c. Depends on whether she was going to receive comp time.
d. Probable liability.
The answer is D (probably liability). We feel like this question might be flawed. The question is frames "you" as the "CEO" (chief exec. officer). We feel question was meant to say "CSE" (chief staff exec.), and particularly because the rest of the question relates to the assn office operations and assn administrative assistant. If the question is truely meant to say "CEO" then that throws the rest of the question into confusion (e.g why would the CEO ask the CSE's admin assistant to stay, which would violate the best practice that board deals with board, staff with staff and CSE is the bridge between the board and staff). So, let's say that we are acting as CSE, then is it true that the Board is liable for the actions of the CSE with regard his or her interaction with a staff member? Are we reading too much into this question!?!?
Next question...
15. Life insurance, as an employee benefit is a(n):
a. Motivator
b. De-motivator
c. Hygiene factor
d. Necessary part of any employee benefit program
The answer is c. We thought that someone in the immersion course (Elizabeth perhaps??) said that the "Hygiene factor" has been disproven as a viable motivational theory. Can anyone confirm this?
Next question...
18. When interviewing you MAY ask questions related to which of the following:
a. Religious holidays observed.
b. Membership in any union.
c. Veteran status.
d. Maiden name.
The answer is b. We understand why the other 3 are incorrect. But, why is asking "membership in any union" allowed? We know that an employer cannot encourage or compel an employee to join or not to join a union.
Thanks for any and all assistance in answering our questions!!!
Polly